Press Release
Moneyspider.com
PRESS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE DISTRIBUTION
10 July 2007
BOUTIQUE FUND MANAGERS SCOOP TOP HONOURS IN GLOBAL
GROWTH SECTOR - SMALL IS BEAUTIFUL, SAYS MONEYSPIDER
-
new
research shows boutiques leave the big houses standing
-
global
growth a clear winner
-
diversification
key to boosting portfolio performance
GLOBAL GROWTH funds hold the key to excellent investment returns, according to
new research by investment data analyst Moneyspider.com - but it's the small boutique funds that are posting stellar returns,
leaving the big name fund management houses trailing in their wake.
Bill Ross, managing director of Moneyspider.com
believes Global Growth funds offer a logical alternative to the UK funds since
the home market makes up marginally less than 10 per cent1 of the
global market.
And since UK investors hold about 90 per cent2 of their money
in UK funds, it is surely illogical to have most of one's eggs in such a relatively
small basket.
The Global Growth tree (see table 1) has been dominated by the little
known Neptune Global Equity fund for the past five years - a £5,000 investment
in the fund would have made a profit of £8,071, a gain of more than 160 per
cent over the period.
Another top performing boutique fund - Rathbone Global Opportunities -
has also delivered substantial profits of £6,086, growth of over 120 per cent
since 2002.
Yet the same amount invested in the bottom of the pile - the Scottish
Widows' Global Growth fund - would have produced a derisory profit of just
£662, far less than if the money had been held in an ordinary savings account
(see note 1) over the same period.
"This dramatic imbalance in returns shows the importance of not automatically putting your trust in
the big name fund management houses," says Moneyspider.com
managing director Bill Ross.
"Small houses such as Rathbone and Neptune can seriously reward
investors who are prepared to consider unfamiliar or even unknown names," believes
Ross.
The global growth
sector's popularity looks set to continue. It was the most popular product
category for worldwide pension fund manager searches in 20063, and
accounted for nearly a third - 31 per cent - of the total $92.3 billion total
assets held in global stock markets.
The case for focusing on top boutique houses is further strengthened by
Fidelity's recent surprise announcement that its own multi-manager team does
not hold any of its UK funds within its range - rather it prefers to back funds
from boutiques.
While returns from the top funds in the Global Growth sector are
impressive, barely 7.5 per cent of the total funds held in ISA wrappers4
are in this key sector.
The most popular IMA sector is UK All Companies, which currently holds
the lion's share of investors' ISA money - 31 per cent of all ISA investors
hold £13billion under management in this zone.
"Investing money in the right funds within the UK All Companies sector
would have generally produced good returns. However, the top performing
portfolios would have had a good cross sector of funds and geographical
exposure, so Global Growth is likely to be a key component in asset allocation
going forward," added Ross.
"Because of their excellent performance, Global Growth funds from the
best managers are likely to become an increasing part of the investment
landscape over the next decade, providing UK-based investors with much needed
geographical diversification," he said.
"Asset allocation has always been and remains one of the key factors in
investment returns."
Table 1:
|
IMA Sector:
Global Growth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moneyspider
|
£5,000
|
|
Fund Name
|
Organisation
|
Rating
|
% Score
|
5 yr gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neptune Global
Equity A
|
Neptune
Investment Mgmt
|
A
|
98.855
|
£8,071
|
|
Rathbone Global
Opportunities
|
Rathbone UT Mgrs
|
A
|
98.0665
|
£6,086
|
|
Jupiter Fund of
Investment Trusts
|
Jupiter UT Mgrs
|
A
|
97.169
|
£5,563
|
|
Invesco Perp
Global Smaller Cos
|
Invesco Perpetual
Fund Mgrs
|
A
|
95.7476
|
£4,973
|
|
JPM Investment
Trust A
|
JP Morgan Asset
Mgmt (UK)
|
A
|
93.8678
|
£4,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Invesco Perp
International Growth
|
Invesco Perpetual
Fund Mgrs
|
D
|
34.8309
|
£1,179
|
|
JPM Global A
|
JP Morgan Asset
Mgmt (UK)
|
D
|
33.3237
|
£1,198
|
|
Morgan Stanley
Global Val Eq I
|
Morgan Stanley
Inv Mgmt UK
|
D
|
32.2247
|
£1,058
|
|
Lazard
International Equity R
|
Lazard Fund Mgrs
|
D
|
30.9745
|
£964
|
|
Scot Wid Global
Growth A
|
Scottish Widows
|
D
|
26.1739
|
£662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source:
Moneyspider.com / Financial Express 22.06.07.
|
|
|
|
Note 1:£5,000 in the Halifax Web Saver account
would have earned approximately £1,188.54 (gross) or £950.83 (net) interest
over a period of five years
1 FTSE International
2 IMA, June 2007
3 Research conducted by Mercer Investment
Consulting Jan 07
4 IMA, April 2007
- Ends-
Editor's notes
Moneyspider was launched in April 2004 and
is a totally independent investment research and information company for
private investors. Moneyspider
constantly monitors all 2,000 or so funds available to UK investors and
provides online personal reports that are updated on a daily basis showing
current valuation and performance of all funds in one place.
The Moneyspider Rating® provides a
unique assessment of the performance of each fund measured against four key
parameters:
-
Sector ranking: a comparison with all other funds in the same sector as your
fund (based on the sector definitions used by the Investment Management
Association).
-
All funds ranking: a comparison with all other 2000 or so Unit Trusts and Open
Ended Investment Company funds available to UK investors.
-
FTSE 100: a comparison of the total return of the fund with the total return of
the FTSE 100 index (comprising the UK's 100 largest companies), providing a
consistent benchmark for each fund.
-
Cash: a comparison of the fund's performance with the return from an equivalent
amount deposited in a 90 day non-high interest access account.
Moneyspider's unique computer system calculates the results, with specific
weightings allocated to each of the four categories, with each one analysed and
compared over 1, 3 and 5 years. Although the rating is generated from a highly
complex, computer-based performance analysis, involving 34 separate
computations, it produces a simple and straightforward result; scoring each of
your funds from A (a very high rating) to E (a distinctly poor rating).
Behind these easy-to-understand ratings is a percentage score which is
calculated to four decimal points. Each day Moneyspider's system calculates
this percentage score for every single one of the 2000 or so funds on our
database, thus providing a comprehensive ranking for all funds. The 'Rank in
Sector' for each fund on the Moneyspider Report, is based on the ranking of these
percentage scores.
Moneyspider is an appointed
representative of Anthony, Bryant & Company (Investment Consultants)
Limited of 25 Eccleston Square, London SW1V 1NS, which is authorised and
regulated by the Financial Services Authority. The contents of this press
release are not intended, and should not be construed as, advice, a
recommendation or as an inducement to buy or sell any investment. Moneyspider
relies on information regarding investments that is provided by third parties
and accepts no liability (including that arising from negligence) for the
accuracy of such information.
A DAVID
ANDREWS MEDIA LTD RELEASE June 2007
|