Press Release
Moneyspider.com
PRESS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE DISTRIBUTION
24 September 2007
FUND MANAGER'S BI-ANNUAL
STATEMENTS DUE SHORTLY- BUT INVESTORS WILL BE NONE THE WISER, WARNS MONEYSPIDER.COM
| - |
Vast
majority of PEP and ISA investors will still be in the dark - even after next
month's bi-annual statement, says Moneyspider.com |
| - |
Comparing
performance of funds from all sectors is the key to success |
BI-ANNUAL statements are due to go out to millions of unit trust, ISA
and PEP investors next month - but the typical fund holder will be none the
wiser as to how their investments are really
performing, warns online
investment funds analyst Moneyspider.com.
The majority of investment houses post out details on their funds a
couple of times a year, usually in April and October.
But the fund manager's statement typically tells the investor only how
his fund has performed and what it is worth.
It is what it leaves
out
that would enable investors to make a genuinely informed decision.
"Surely investors deserve to know whether their fund is a winner or a
loser when compared with other funds in the same sector, and indeed in other
sectors," argues Moneyspider.com's
Tony Ahearne.
"But, unless a fund is doing especially well - and many are not in the
current downturn - it will probably suit the fund management company for its
investors to be none the wiser," adds Ahearne.
"Even some of the best-known fund management companies often have funds
that are performing abysmally. But they won't tell you which they are, even if
your money is invested in them.
"This could be costing you hundreds, if not thousands of pounds.
Conversely some of the small, little known boutique fund managers are producing
consistently stellar performance.
"Fund managers are under no obligation to issue anything but the most
basic information to investors to satisfy FSA requirements, "says Ahearne.
"Less sophisticated investors - who are effectively the majority - would
benefit enormously from an 'at a glance' service telling them how their fund
has performed compared with all the other funds they might have invested in and
crucially how their fund is rated.
"A fund manager's report may brag that their fund is in the top quartile
or even decile which sounds impressive, but it is scant consolation if the
investor has lost money," points out Ahearne.
"Moneyspider.com monitors all
its clients' funds every day and analyses their performance against every other
fund on the market. (see Editor's Notes)
"This means that at any time investors will know exactly what their
funds are worth, how they are rated and how they compare with other funds.
"Moneyspider.com compares the performance of all 2,000 or so IMA listed funds and
provides a unique rating for each one. For PEP, ISA and Unit Trust investors this is an invaluable service and could make the difference between
making substantial profits by being in the right funds or losing money by
staying in those funds which consistently fail to deliver," adds Ahearne.
"In essence Moneyspider.com
tells investors what their fund manager can't such as how the fund they are
invested in compares with other funds from other fund managers.
At the core of Moneyspider.com's
service is an easy to follow ratings system which indicates how the investor's
funds are performing. The unique Moneyspider Rating® System (see Editor's
Notes) ranks every fund from A (very high rating) to E (distinctly poor).
"Any investor with a portfolio of D and E rated funds has a problem of
which he or she is probably completely unaware. Where money is concerned
ignorance is certainly not bliss - rather it is potentially disastrous," says
Ahearne.
"In addition to rating each fund our personalised reports also show the
current value of a portfolio and give details on the performance of a client's
funds compared to others in the same sector and in other sectors. Updated
daily, it is an invaluable tool, making the difference between ignorance and
enlightenment."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UK All Companies Sector
|
|
Moneyspider
|
|
|
Fund Name
|
Fund Group
|
Rating
|
% Score
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top 5
|
Old Mutual UK
Select Mid Cap
|
Old Mutual Fund
Managers (UT)
|
A
|
99.2624
|
|
Funds
|
Rensburg UK Mid
Cap Growth Trust
|
Rensburg Fund
Mgmt
|
A
|
98.7102
|
|
|
Schroder UK
Mid250
|
Schroder UT Mgrs
|
A
|
98.434
|
|
|
Allianz RCM UK
Mid Cap
|
Allianz Global
Investors UK
|
A
|
97.6091
|
|
|
SVM UK
Opportunities A
|
SVM Asset
Management Ltd
|
A
|
97.6076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bottom 5
|
Direct Line FTSE4
Good Tracker ST
|
Direct Line UT
Mgmt
|
C
|
44.0546
|
|
Funds
|
Hiscox UK
Opportunities
|
Hiscox
|
D
|
40.8695
|
|
|
EFA James
Brearley Premium Gth
|
WAY Fund Managers
|
D
|
37.5721
|
|
|
Marlborough UK
Equity Growth
|
Marlborough Fund
Mgrs
|
D
|
34.6898
|
|
|
Manek Growth
|
Manek Inv Mgmt
|
D
|
29.4152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source:
Moneyspider.com / Financial Express 12.09.07.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Ends-
Editor's notes
Moneyspider
was launched in April 2004 and is a totally independent investment
research and information company for private investors. Moneyspider
constantly monitors all 2,000 or so funds available to UK investors
and provides online personal reports that are updated on a daily
basis showing current valuation and performance of all funds in one
place.
The Moneyspider Rating® provides a unique
assessment of the performance of each fund measured against four key
parameters:
-
Sector ranking: a comparison with all other funds in the same sector as your
fund (based on the sector definitions used by the Investment Management
Association).
-
All funds ranking: a comparison with all other 2000 or so Unit Trusts and Open
Ended Investment Company funds available to UK investors.
-
FTSE 100: a comparison of the total return of the fund with the total return of
the FTSE 100 index (comprising the UK's 100 largest companies), providing a
consistent benchmark for each fund.
-
Cash: a comparison of the fund's performance with the return from an equivalent
amount deposited in a 90 day non-high interest access account.
Moneyspider's unique computer system calculates
the results, with specific weightings allocated to each of the four
categories, with each one analysed and compared over 1, 3 and 5
years. Although the rating is generated from a highly complex,
computer-based performance analysis, involving 34 separate
computations, it produces a simple and straightforward result;
scoring each of your funds from A (a very high rating) to E (a
distinctly poor rating).
Behind these easy-to-understand ratings is a
percentage score which is calculated to four decimal points. Each
day Moneyspider's system calculates this percentage score for every
single one of the 2000 or so funds on our database, thus providing a
comprehensive ranking for all funds. The 'Rank in Sector' for each
fund on the Moneyspider Report, is based on the ranking of these
percentage scores.
Moneyspider is an appointed representative of
Anthony, Bryant & Company (Investment Consultants) Limited of 25
Eccleston Square, London SW1V 1NS, which is authorised and regulated
by the Financial Services Authority. The contents of this press
release are not intended, and should not be construed as, advice, a
recommendation or as an inducement to buy or sell any investment.
Moneyspider relies on information regarding investments that is
provided by third parties and accepts no liability (including that
arising from negligence) for the accuracy of such
information.
A DAVID ANDREWS MEDIA LTD RELEASE September 2007
|